Posts Tagged ‘Road Diet’

Tums for Tom

Monday, May 31st, 2010

Since Wednesday, a citizen backlash has gone from a single energized individual to a facebook group with over 100 friends, a google group with at least 27 members a lot of activity, and some press.

Why the backlash?  A few years ago, on Stone Way, a handful of businesses stalled a much needed safety project for over a year.  Today, a business group is threatening to stall or block similar measures for Nickerson Street, and now Seattle councilmember Tom Rasmussen says that the Nickerson road diet gives him “indigestion.”   Those businesses along with a community club and a neighborhood organization are claiming that they represent the entire neighborhoods of Queen Anne and Magnolia in opposing the road diet.  This has engergized some concerned individuals in those neighborhoods who really want the road diet.

Our friends over at Cascade are running a Tums for Tom  campaign to write the councilmember and offer him antacid.  While it is fun to think of Tom’s office flooded with hundreds of bottles of Tums on Tuesday, we’d like to remind the good councilmember of some recent history:

Tom,

SeattleLikesBikes was there when the road diet was to be implemented on Stone Way.  Freight businesses claimed that there were too many trucks that created a safety hazard.  Local businesses claimed that they’d be forced to close and that the change was a big surprise to them.  Pedestrians were tired of not being able to cross the street.  Cyclists wanted a place to ride.  Neighbors wanted their crosswalks back.  We held a protest bicycle ride to request that the city continue to follow the Bicycle Master Plan and implement the road diet.  Some business owners picketed our protest ride, one with “Bikers are Bullies” signs.

We engaged those business owners in a conversation, if you can call them yelling at us while we tried to calmly discuss our differences.  We found that they had most of their facts wrong, and they were scared and unwilling to back down.  A year of studies showed that the road diet would make traffic flow more smoothly and that it wouldn’t cause the doomsday scenarios that the business owners feared. 

It is distressing that business worries put the lives of their neighbors at risk.  In the year of the study, pedestrians faced a higher risk of being hit trying to cross the street.  In our protest ride, a pedestrian was legally crossing the street and was nearly run down by a motorist who sped up to pass illegally and dangerously close to him.  SDOT reports that the road diet has reduced collisions with pedestrians on Stone Way by 80%. 

 Today Nickerson poses similar hazards to pedestrians as Stone Way did before the road diet.  To see the problem, stand at 12th or 13th on the north side of Nickerson and try to cross to the south side of Nickerson (where the trail is).  Now that gives us heartburn.  We are some pretty hearty urban cyclists and aren’t intimidated by much, but that scares us!

Please push the road diet forward, don’t let it take a fatality before the city fixes this dangerous road!

Sincerely,

SeattleLikesBikes.org

Make Nickerson Street safer

Thursday, May 27th, 2010

What do you do when an industrial organization twists the arm of a community group and forms a coalition that advocates against safety?  What do you do when they tell the city that they are speaking for you in the process?

That is what is happening in Magnolia and Queen Anne.

As a result, a few individuals are trying to put together their own coalition to organize those who are in favor of the road diet.  Without the deep industrial pockets of the North Seattle Industrial Association, this group was formed just a few days ago and has no budget for publicity.  The members just want a safer Nickerson Street.

http://groups.google.com/group/Nickerson-road-diet

As we reported earlier, when the city planned to implement a road diet on Stone Way, a business coalition was formed and pulled developer Suzie Burke in to twist the arm of the mayor and halt the project while the city studied the situation for another year.  In that year, SeattleLikesBikes organized a protest ride where hundreds of bicycles tried to create a traffic jam.  It turns out that bicycles are horribly inefficient at creating traffic jams and cars are much better.  We showed that it was a very important issue for cyclists and for the community, we helped do traffic counts that showed that the 4-lanes were not the best solution considering the high level of turning traffic and eventually the city implemented the road diet.

SDOT released a study on the before and after of the Stone Way road diet.  As we reported earlier, motorist vs. pedestrian crashes went down 80% and speeding to the excess of 10+ mph over the limit dropped 75%.  Road diets make safer roads.

So why now and why Nickerson?

Nickerson Street, like Stone Way was and like 24th Ave NW was, is a 4-lane street that used to have marked crosswalks at intersections without stoplights.  A few years ago a study came out that said that those crosswalks were risky, so SDOT removed them.  For SDOT to have a crosswalk on a 4-lane street, they want to have a stoplight there.  Stoplights cost around $100,000 to $200,000 to install at an intersection on average.  Paint for the entire Nickerson road diet will be almost less than the cost of putting in a single crosswalk.

There are arguments from the other side of course. 

They say that it will create a traffic jam around the Fremont Bridge, but they aren’t paying attention and aren’t seeing that the road diet stops long before that point.  They also aren’t seeing that less speeding earlier means less traffic backup later.

They say that cyclists should just use the Ship Canal Trail, but they don’t see that the Ship Canal Trail doesn’t connect anywhere and that it is nearly impossible to cross the 4 lanes of 45 mph traffic coming from two directions around a low-visibility curve to cross from the north side of Nickerson to get to the trail.

They say that this is the cycling lobby pushing their agenda, but they don’t see that Nickerson bisects the Seattle Pacific University campus and that the traffic creates more than a half-mile wall for pedestrians.

The Nickerson Street road diet is a safety issue.  We need to move forward with it today!

A diet that we love

Tuesday, May 25th, 2010

In 2007, we had just passed the Bicycle Master Plan and a group of businesses were shocked the city was going to remove a lane from the Stone Way and they were scared that it would result in horrible traffic backups.  By 2010, they believed that traffic would increase 10-times and that the loss of a lane would create gridlock.

SDOT just release a study of that road diet.

http://www.seattle.gov/transportation/docs/StoneWaybeforeafterFINAL.pdf

Pedestrian collisions are down 80%

Bicycle traffic is up 35%.

Vehicles speeding by 10+ mph dropped by 75%!

The businesses that offered the stiffest resistance to the road diet are even still open and don’t see gridlock blocking their front doors.

The city is currently debating a road diet on Nickerson, and we encourage the city to look at the success of Stone Way and make the needed changes for the safety of the college students who cross this road every day.